Commercial Investment Real Estate

NOV-DEC 2017

Commercial Investment Real Estate is the magazine of the CCIM Institute, the leading provider of commercial real estate education. CIRE covers market trends, current developments, and business strategies within the commercial real estate field.

Issue link: http://cire.epubxp.com/i/897832

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 20 of 90

COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE 16 November | December 2017 D uring the Great Recession, cooling capital markets, greater regulatory scrutiny, and tighter underwriting for commercial mortgage-backed securities caused more challenges for financing transitional assets. Even as the economy has improved, CMBS markets have not adapted. As a result, bridge lending has stepped in to fill the gaps. Since its comeback, commercial real estate professionals will have more opportunities to use capital from bridge loans to assist with clos- ing deals. It is crucial to understand its nuances. In recent years, major companies such as Teva Pharmaceuti- cal Industries, Anthem, AbbVie, and Aetna have used bridge loans for initial financing of significant acquisitions. When Teva bought Allergan's generic business in 2015, it lined up $27 bil- lion of debt to finance the $40.5 billion deal. Likewise, health insurer Anthem borrowed $26.5 billion in bridge financing for its $54.2 billion purchase of Cigna Corp. While biopharma- ceutical company AbbVie secured an $18 billion bridge loan to finance its $21 billion acquisition of Pharmacyclics, Aetna lined up a $16.2 billion bridge loan to fund its $47 billion purchase of smaller rival Humana. Total U.S. loan volume reached $2 trillion in 2016, and many of those loans started with bridge financing. Intended as an interim step before securing permanent financing, bridge loans typically range from two weeks to three years. From the commercial real estate perspective, com- pared to other financial products, bridge loans are monitored at higher levels. In contrast, traditional CMBS loans are static at inception and constrained by limitations from the Internal Revenue Code. Funding Obligations For bridge loans, lenders impose hard cash management at origi- nation. These cash management provisions feature cash traps with complex debt-coverage ratio or debt yield tests that com- mercial real estate professionals have to calculate. To date, no consensus exists about how to perform these cal- culations. To the extent that bridge loans feature future funding, commercial real estate professionals should understand that a cash trap's debt yield test may differ from the test related to a future advance. WIN-Initiative/Getty Images INVESTMENT A N A LYS I S Bridge Loans Rising Due to tougher regulations, bridge loans are in high demand as a stop-gap measure. by Geoffrey R. Maibohm and Robert J. Sullivan

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Commercial Investment Real Estate - NOV-DEC 2017